1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

The first instance court.

1. Quotation of judgment of the first instance;

A. The reasoning for the court’s explanation concerning the instant case is next to the judgment of the first instance.

It is identical to the judgment of the first instance court, except for the modification as stated in paragraph (2) and the addition of the judgment in the next trial, and it is also accepted by the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

B. Part 1) The amendment of the first instance court’s judgment is just a part that “the letter of seal” was issued in accordance with the first instance court’s first instance judgment No. 4, 4, 5, 6, 11, 5, 2, 24, and 20, respectively, shall be deemed “the letter of seal” and “the letter of seal was issued” (the value of the underlying claim of the Promissory Notes of this case is KRW 445,031,490). In addition, “The amount of underlying claim of this case is claimed to be KRW 445,031,490.”

3) Article 17 of the first instance court's decision No. 4, 17 of the first instance court's "as seen earlier" is "the contents of the Promissory Notes No. 5 of the fifth to "the defendant's signature and seal of the original seal", and "the time or amount of the loan" of the first and second instances No. 11, 12 as "the time or amount of the loan of the defendant's assertion or the amount of the underlying claim" and "the time or amount of the loan of the defendant's claim", "the time or amount of the loan of the defendant's claim is issued or the amount of the underlying claim of the defendant's claim", "the issuance of the first0" of the first instance court's decision No. 11 as "the time or amount of the loan of the defendant's claim", and "the issuance of the second part" of the first instance court's decision No. 8 of the fifth to "the Promissory Notes No. 4 of the second instance judgment" is presumed to be "the original seal of the original bill No. 111,".

5 The plaintiff's application for adjudication on this case was dismissed on May 12, 2017 and finalized as it is, immediately after the 18th judgment of the court of first instance was rejected.

Section 20 on the fourth side while adding "the fourth side".