(영문) 서울고등법원 2017.11.24 2017나2022856

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 서울고등법원 2017.11.24 2017나2022856

대여금 등

Text

1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

1..

Reasons

1. Quotation of judgment of the first instance;

A. The reasons why the court should explain the cited part of this case are as follows.

Except for the revision of the judgment of the first instance as stated in paragraph (2) and addition of the judgment in the trial as described in paragraph (2), the relevant part shall be cited in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act, since the judgment of the first instance is identical to that of the defendant.

B. Part 1) The amendment of the first instance court Decision 2) added “(hereinafter “the instant loan”).” The “Defendant B’s husband” as “the Defendant B’s husband at the time,” and added “B evidence 2” on the same side [the grounds for recognition] of the first instance court Decision 2) the second and the third and the first and the first and the first and the second “loan” as “the instant loan.”

3) The witness G’s testimony is added to “the result of the party’s personal examination,” of the fourth 10th judgment of the court of first instance, and then the same “this court” as “the court of first instance” is deleted from the fifth 1st judgment of the court of first instance to the same third 3rd .

5) The first instance court’s fifth sentence’s statement was immediately added to “(the G involved in the preparation of the above lease agreement in managing and operating a hotel in the real estate with Defendant C’s Do and in the process of examining the witness of the party in question)” respectively. 6) The first instance court’s sixth sentence “this judgment” is respectively dismissed as “the first instance court’s judgment.”

2. Further determination is that the Plaintiff entered into a lease agreement with the co-defendant B of the first instance trial on the basis of the entries in Eul evidence Nos. 1, 3, and 4, and the entries in Eul evidence Nos. 1, 3, and 5 through 7 with respect to the co-defendant B of the first instance trial on or around December 31, 2014, and the lease deposit amount of KRW 600,000,000 with respect to the real estate in a tent.

참조조문

-민사소송법 제420조

유사 판례

-서울고등법원 2017.12.08 2017나2035234

-서울고등법원 2017.06.21 2016누71913

-서울고등법원 2019.04.12 2018나2051646

-서울고등법원 2017.09.28 2017누42172

-서울고등법원 2017.02.22 2016누44225