1.The part against the defendant in the judgment of the first instance, including the claims extended in the trial, shall be modified as follows:

1. Quotation of judgment of the first instance;

A. The reasons why the court should explain the cited part of this case are as follows.

Except for the revision of the judgment of the first instance as stated in paragraph (2) and addition of the judgment in the trial as described in paragraph (2), the relevant part shall be cited in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act, since the judgment of the first instance is identical to that of the defendant.

B. Part 1) The 3rd 10th 10th 10th 10th 1st 10 judgment of the first instance court is “Defendant Company”; the 4th 8th 8th h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h; the 8th 6th h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h

(4) Along with the foregoing, Article 20 of the first instance court’s judgment provides that “A person who has a claim for a loan” under Section 14 of the first instance court’s 10th judgment was liable for the loan, and deleted according to the evidence of the first instance court’s 20th judgment.

5 In accepting the claim extended in the trial of the trial, the “Guing” of the first instance judgment No. 11 in the first instance judgment No. 10 shall be extended from the trial, and the “B from March 17, 201” in the first instance judgment No. 10 and the “B from March 17, 2016” in the first instance judgment No. 288,00,000 won “B” in the entirety of the monetary donation contract for “B from March 17, 2016.”