logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2019.03.15 2018나2034054
물품대금
Text

1. All appeals filed by the Plaintiff (Counterclaim Defendant) and the Defendant (Counterclaim Plaintiff) are dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne respectively by each party.

Reasons

1. Quotation of judgment of the first instance;

A. The reasoning for the court’s explanation concerning the instant case is next to the judgment of the first instance.

The decision of the court of first instance is the same as that of the decision of the court of first instance, except for the modification as stated in paragraph 2 and the addition of the decision in the next trial as stated in paragraph 2.

B. Part 1) The amendment of the first instance court’s 3th 8th 1st h h h h h h h h h h h h h h l h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h, h h h h, h h h h h h h, h h h h, h h h h h h, h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h.

3. According to the first instance court's decision No. 5, Paragraph 4 of the same Article, "it is difficult to make" as "the continuous contractual relationship with the term of the contract of one year." Thus, if the individual contract constituting the contract is concluded and the whole contract is being implemented, it is generally difficult for the Plaintiff and the Defendant to expect "cancellation" of the entire contract as well as "the individual contract" to be "in relation to the clothing supply contract of this case" (see, e.g., Article 22 of the clothing supply contract of this case (Evidence No. 3 of this case).

arrow