1. The Defendant’s KRW 15,965,180 for the Plaintiff and 6% per annum from October 3, 2015 to April 27, 2016.

1. Basic facts

A. The Plaintiff is a company engaged in furniture manufacturing and sales business, indoor construction business, etc., and the Defendant is a company engaged in furniture manufacturing and sales business, interior design and construction business, etc.

B. After receiving a contract for interior construction from an apartment contractor, etc., the Defendant requested the Plaintiff to produce and supply system households established in the sampling house.

Accordingly, the plaintiff supplied households to five sites as follows.

(2) On-the-spot supply (unit: 1. 4. 28 April 2014. 28, 2014. 4, 895, 200 (489,520) 5,384, 720 on-the-spot supply, 3. 1,96, 100 (19, 610) 2,195, 710. 2, 304. 4. 1, 203, 204, 2014. 4. 1, 205, 204, 304. 4. 1, 205, 204, 204. 4. 1, 205, 204, 304. 1, 204, 205, 204. 1, 204, 2014. 3. 4, 2014

C. The plaintiff is expected to give orders for the construction works following the sampling supply at the above five sites. However, the defendant did not place an order for the construction works to the plaintiff.

As above, the Plaintiff demanded the payment of the price for the supply of a household by issuing a tax invoice dated February 28, 2015.

On the other hand, around October 2014, the Plaintiff received from the Defendant a delivery of “Treatment Construction Busan City Center”-related household units for the main construction work, and performed a brick panel repair work at the Defendant’s request during the process of performing work.

On February 28, 2015, the Plaintiff issued a tax invoice of KRW 2,431,00 (the supply price of KRW 2,210,000, value-added tax of KRW 221,00).

[Ground of recognition] A. A. 1-5, 7 evidence (including more than one number) without dispute.