logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2016.06.01 2015가단16703
납품대금
Text

1. The Defendant’s KRW 96,904,50 for the Plaintiff and KRW 6% per annum from December 19, 2014 to June 1, 2016.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. The Defendant’s business implementation 1) The Defendant’s business of the shipping ELS Development Project for the Shipping ELS (hereinafter “instant business”).

2) From April 2012, the Defendant began to consult on the terms and conditions of construction work with the Daewoo Construction Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Treatment Construction”).

On July 5, 2012, the Defendant concluded a memorandum of understanding with the Treatment Construction.

3) On August 28, 2012, the Defendant is a model licensee of the instant business (hereinafter referred to as “design licensee”).

(4) On January 3, 2013, the Defendant discussed the shareholder agreement (the shareholder agreement) containing the business share, and began consultations on the interior plan, etc. for each household.

나. 원고의 가구 납품 1) 원고는 대우건설의 협력업체이다. 2) 원고는 모델하우스 내에 설치될 외국산 가구(58평 톤첼리 38,248,100원, 65평 세자르 48,495,700원, 보조주방가구 10,160,700원 합계 95,904,500원)를 수입하여, 2013. 1. 4.경 모델하우스에 설치를 마쳤다

(3) On January 31, 2013, the Defendant planned the instant household supply (hereinafter referred to as “the instant household supply”). On January 31, 2013, the Defendant, while the Defendant and treatment construction officers and employees are the mother, engaged in the first competitive show, and judged inappropriate. The products of sarsens supplied and installed in 65 square meters were removed, and replaced by other products of the waterway lending. 4) The Defendant planned the second competitive show on March 15, 2013, but the Defendant was unable to conduct the competitive show on March 14, 2013, which was the preceding day.

Since then, the defendant did not enter into an agreement with the treatment Construction and shareholders.

[Reasons for Recognition] 1 to 4, Eul 1 to 5, each entry of Gap 1 to 5 (including branch numbers), and the purport of the whole pleadings

2. The plaintiff alleged by the parties shall claim against the defendant, who is the executor, the price for the delivery of the instant household.

arrow