1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

1...

1. Basic facts

A. The Defendant’s business implementation 1) The Defendant’s business development project for the LCT LT (LC) of the 1058-dong 1058-dong 1058-dong 1058-dong 100-dong 105-dong 10-dong 10

2) From April 2012, the Defendant began to consult with treatment Construction Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Treatment Construction”) about the terms and conditions of construction work of the instant project, and made preparation of a memorandum of understanding around July 5, 2012.

Afterward, the defendant and the construction company did not conclude the shareholders' agreement or the construction contract because they discussed the shareholders' agreement on the contents of the share of duties related to the business of this case until the first half of March 2013, but did not reach an agreement.

3) On the other hand, the Defendant selected a model house design and construction company, and around the end of 2012, the Defendant’s model house of the instant business (hereinafter “instant model house”).

B. The Plaintiff’s household supply 1) The Plaintiff is a cooperative company for treatment construction, which is a company that engages in household manufacturing and sales business.

On January 4, 2013, the Plaintiff supplied a total amount of KRW 96,904,50 (including value-added tax) of the imported main household equivalent to KRW 38,248,100 (in the case of 58 square), KRW 48,495,700 (in the case of 65 square) and KRW 10,160,70 (in the case of 65 square).

(2) On January 31, 2013, the Defendant’s first model voucher show was conducted in the presence of its executives and employees on January 31, 2013, and on March 14, 2013, the day preceding the scheduled date of the second model voucher show of this case, treatment construction employees were removed from the model voucher of this case, the Defendant’s employees participated in the second model voucher of this case on March 15, 2013. [The Defendant’s 1, 2, and 2, the grounds for recognition are as follows: (a) the Defendant’s 1, 2, and 2, respectively.