logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 부천지원 2018.12.21 2018가합102996
물품대금
Text

1. The Defendant shall pay to the Plaintiff KRW 253,00,000 and the interest rate of KRW 15% per annum from July 27, 2018 to the date of full payment.

Reasons

1. Facts of recognition;

A. On January 6, 2017, the Plaintiff entered into a household supply contract with the Defendant setting the contract amount of KRW 450,000,000 (excluding value-added tax) for the site of “C” (excluding value-added tax) and completed the supply of households equivalent to KRW 495,00,000 (including value-added tax) for the Defendant from April 1, 2017 to December 31, 2017, and issued a tax invoice for KRW 445,50,000 among them (including value-added tax).

B. On January 6, 2017, the Plaintiff entered into a household supply contract with the Defendant setting the contract amount of KRW 800,000,000 (excluding value-added tax) for the site of “D”, and completed the supply of a household equivalent to KRW 880,000 (including value-added tax) for the Defendant from April 1, 2017 to December 31, 2017, and issued a tax invoice for KRW 792,00,000 among them (including value-added tax).

C. The plaintiff is against the defendant.

B. Payment of KRW 1,375,000,000 (= KRW 495,000,000 + KRW 880,000,000 + value-added tax (including value-added tax) out of the total amount under each household supply contract (hereinafter “each household supply contract of this case”).

[Grounds for Recognition] Confession (Article 150 (3) and (1) of the Civil Procedure Act)

2. According to the facts found in the determination as to the cause of the claim, the Defendant is obligated to pay to the Plaintiff the amount of KRW 253,000,000 (including KRW 1,375,000,000 - KRW 1,122,00,000, value-added tax) out of the payment under each household supply contract of this case and damages for delay at the rate of 15% per annum under the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Promotion, etc. of Legal Proceedings from July 27, 2018 to the date of full payment.

3. In conclusion, the plaintiff's claim is justified, and it is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow