A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than two months.

Punishment of the crime

On November 30, 2018, the Defendant was sentenced to one year and six months of imprisonment for the crime of occupational embezzlement at the Suwon District Court on December 8, 2018, and the said judgment became final and conclusive on December 8, 2018, and on May 10, 2019, the Defendant was sentenced to eight months of imprisonment for fraud, etc. in the Sungnam branch of the Suwon District Court on May 18, 2019.

From early March 2018 to April 2018, the Defendant was an employee of “D”, a mobile phone agent located in Seoul Songpa-gu Seoul building C, and opened his/her mobile phone under the name of E using his/her personal information, and had the intent to pay his/her personal debt by selling a mobile phone terminal.

1. Around April 14, 2018, the Defendant forged private document: (a) without being delegated by E; (b) without being delegated by E; (c) without being delegated by E; (d) “application for F Momble”; (c) “application for F Moble grant”; (d) “certificate of guidance on standard contracts for radio service; (e) combination of F; (e) collection, use and provision of personal information; and (e) written the written consent form with E’s personal information and signature.

Accordingly, for the purpose of uttering, the Defendant forged private documents concerning rights and obligations in the name of E, and certificates of fact.

2. On April 14, 2018, the Defendant: (a) sent the victim Company F, as if he/she had duly completed the “written application for bracking” in the name of counterfeit E; (b) “application for Fracking fee”; (c) “application for Fracking grant”; (d) “Fracking standard guide”; and (e) “Fracking, collecting, using, and providing personal information; and (e) the consignment agreement” in the said agency; and (e) sent the victim Company F with one cellular phone device at the market price of KRW 1,254,00,000, which was entered into the name of E; and (e) received one unit of bracking mobile phone device from the victim to the victim Company F.

Accordingly, the defendant exercises the forged private document and received the property by deceiving the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. The police in relation to G.