1. The Defendant’s order to pay penalty surcharges in attached Form 2, which the Plaintiff rendered against the Plaintiff by resolution B on January 15, 2018, is revoked.

2.

1. Basic facts

A. On September 29, 2005, the status and general status of the Plaintiff, etc., and the name of the company was changed to D on January 11, 2012, established as K on September 29, 2005.

under section D in the case before January 11, 2012, referring to D in the case before January 11, 2012;

The six E, F, G, and other related companies (hereinafter “Plaintiffs, etc.”) are enterprisers engaged in the geographic information system-related business, etc. (hereinafter “GIS”), as prescribed by Article 2 subparagraph 1 of the Monopoly Regulation and Fair Trade Act (amended by Act No. 14813, Apr. 18, 2017; hereinafter “Fair Trade Act”).

The general status of the plaintiff is as listed below.

Plaintiff’s general status (unit: 4,787 3,847 3,509 275 2385 2388 70 4,615 4,613,603,2221 267 69 4,4523,370 3,3703,316 285 287878 2015 4,613,613,603,2221 267 69 2014 4,4523,370 3,316 285 20878

B. H City I Project 1) H Si (hereinafter “H City”) project outlines

Around August 1998, the "L Business Promotion Plan" was formulated in accordance with the J Master Plan in 1995 for the supply of water pipes managed as water works in the paper drawings.

L Project is to utilize computerized pipeline network data and map-based management program in waterworks-related work, and H City completed the construction of L Database around December 2004.

However, until 2004, the waterworks pipeline database was produced by means of a single-use survey or a counter-survey method of the city construction and did not have an examination process for accuracy, and the work performance and quality were not equal due to the fault produced by non-professionals.

H Doz. 50 00

In order to obtain accurate and consistent survey results, it is entrusted to a specialized survey company with the survey, exploration, survey, etc. of underground facilities from July 2005.