1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The defendant's intent of the claim is decided January 15, 2018.

1. Basic facts and circumstances of dispositions;

A. Nine companies, such as Plaintiff, etc., C Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Co., Ltd.”), D, E, F, G, H, I, etc. are enterprisers engaged in the business related to the geographic information system (GIS) (hereinafter “GIS”), as prescribed by Article 2 subparag. 1 of the Monopoly Regulation and Fair Trade Act (amended by Act No. 14813, Apr. 18, 2017; hereinafter “Fair Trade Act”).

The general status of the plaintiff is as follows:

(unit: 18,205 10,579 15,876 47348 48 2015,147 8,305 16,381 4295 2014 19,564 10,564 17,5150 17,5186 3086 308

B. 1) On August 1998, in accordance with the “Master City General Plan for the Establishment of GIST” in 1995, K City established a plan to implement the waterworks pipe map managed as water works on the paper map of the past year. GD projects are used for waterworks-related work, and at December 2004, K City completed the construction of the waterworks GIST database. However, by the year of 2004, the waterworks pipeline database was produced as a single-use survey method and did not have the quality of the work outcomes produced by non-professionals. 2) In order to obtain more accurate and consistent survey results, from July 2005, 200 to entrust the survey and exploration of underground facilities and the guidance-based management program to a specialized business entity for the implementation of the project (hereinafter “the project”).

C. The project of this case 1 as outlined in the bidding of the project of this case is K. K in 2008.