logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
부산지방법원 2014.02.20 2013고단8385
위조공문서행사등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On July 8, 2013, the Defendant received a proposal from the nameless winners (ID: B) of the Internet game “(ID)” to the effect that “If a cell phone is opened and sent through a cell phone in the name of the party, 1.50,000 won per unit” and tried to commit such crime.

1. Around July 9, 2013, the Defendant sent his/her resident registration certificate to a closed bus bus bus terminal located in the Geum-gu, Busan, Simpo-dong bus terminal in accordance with the order of the above person who was named in the name of the deceased, on or before July 9, 2013. However, the Defendant received four forged resident registration certificates, such as C, etc., in which the Defendant’s photograph was combined with the Defendant’s photograph, by using his/her identification card to send the Defendant’s credit status as a result of confirmation, but the Defendant was sent via a cell phone.”

Around 15:40 on July 11, 2013, the Defendant entered “C”, “G”, and “G” in the address column in the new service contract customer column in the F operated by the victim E in Pyeongtaek-si. Around 15:40 on July 11, 2013, the Defendant signed the new service contract in the name of “C”, “G”, and “H in Daegu Metropolitan City Northern-gu.”

As a result, the Defendant forged two copies of the application for joining a mobile phone in the name of C, which is a private document on rights and duties for the purpose of uttering, and subsequently presented the forged official document to the victim E along with the resident registration certificate in the name of the head of the Gu of Daegu Metropolitan City, Daegu, which is an official document, to purchase a smartphone and pay an installment.

However, the defendant purchased smartphones using a forged other person's identification card and did not have an intention or ability to pay installments normally.

Accordingly, the defendant exercises the resident registration certificate of C, which is a forged official document, and exercises two copies of the application form for joining the mobile phone in the name of C.