beta
Text
1. The Defendant (Counterclaim Defendant) Plaintiff (Counterclaim Defendant) KRW 37,386,145, and Plaintiff (Counterclaim Defendant) KRW 3,000,000, and Plaintiff C, respectively.
Reasons
1. Basic facts
A. The parties concerned: (a) at the F Hospital, the Defendant’s representative director (hereinafter “instant hospital”), the Defendant was a person who received shot disc removal from the Defendant, a doctor, and diam sexual intercourse treatment; and (b) Plaintiff A’s spouse, Plaintiff C, and D are children of Plaintiff A.
B. Plaintiff A’s internal source guard 1) was diagnosed by the escape symptoms, etc. of the 4-5 lux in the G Hospital located in Busan, and was conducted to remove a disc for the lux of the lux of the lux of the lux of the lux of the lux of the lux of the lux of the lux of the lux of the lux of the lux of the lux of the lux of the 1st of March 2009. Plaintiff A visited the instant hospital on the increase of the lux of the lux of the lux of the lux of the lux of the lux of the lux of the lux of the lux of the lux of the lux of the lux of the
C. On January 30, 2012, Plaintiff A visited the instant hospital again with the increase of the left-hand bucks, bucks, spucks, spacks, spacks, spacks, and spacks, etc. on the ground that Plaintiff A visited the instant hospital. On February 1, 2012, the Defendant conducted the diagnosis of the spacks of Plaintiff A and various test results on the spackspacks No. 4-5, and on February 1, 2012, the Defendant conducted the diagnosis of the spackspacksp drive removal and the di-mickspick (hereinafter “instant surgery
(2) After the instant surgery, the Defendant complained of the Plaintiff A’s pain, etc., found the fact that the Plaintiff’s treatment and medication was carried out more closely than normal conditions, and conducted a re-operation on February 15, 2012 by removing the existing diam and inserting new diam.
Plaintiff
A’s condition and the subsequent progress 1) Plaintiff A suffered symptoms, such as the instant surgery and re-operation, after undergoing the instant surgery and re-operation at the instant hospital, and received hospital treatment in the instant hospital until May 18, 2012, and thereafter, from October 13, 2014. (2) The Defendant discharged the Plaintiff on May 18, 2012, as follows: