1. The plaintiffs' claims against the defendants are all dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit are assessed against the plaintiffs.

Basic Facts

Defendant C is a person operating the F Hospital located in Busan Dongdong-gu, Busan (hereinafter “Defendant”) and Defendant D is a doctor belonging to the Defendants’ hospital.

Plaintiff

A is a person who received medical treatment at the designated hospital of the Defendants, and the Plaintiff B is a child of the Plaintiff.

Plaintiff

A was conducted on July 2012 and was treated by G Hospital, etc. on the right side side side in terms of the salphal typhe, tension, etc.

Plaintiff

On January 3, 2013, A filed an appeal for the pain card on the right to the outside of the hospital of the Defendants, and the medical personnel of the Defendants hospital, including Defendant D, filed an examination of MRI with the Plaintiff, and the medical personnel of the Defendants hospital conducted the examination of MRI to the Plaintiff, and provided the treatment of the Plaintiff, such as the “salvine for the front collision and for the cost of abandonment.”

Around February 4, 2013, Defendant D performed an emulciating eculation on the right edge part of Plaintiff A (hereinafter “instant surgery”).

Plaintiff

A, even after the instant surgery, complaining of pains, etc. on the right surface, received medical treatment in Hneina, etc. from February 19, 2013.

Plaintiff

A From January 14, 2014, at the Incheon National University Busan National University Hospital, each of the above diagnosis names was given from May 27, 2014, at the Yangsan National University Hospital as the first type of diagnosis. However, at the Yangsan National University Hospital as from May 27, 2014, there were symptoms, such as 'the occurrence of pains', 'the occurrence of pains by pains', 'the restriction on the movement of the right-hand trees by pains', 'the occurrence of pains by pains', 'the restriction on the movement of the right-hand trees by pains', 'the occurrence of pains by pains', etc.

[Reasons for Recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 3 (including a serial number; hereinafter the same shall apply) are written, the result of the commission of physical examination to the director of the human rights university Busan Hospital Hospital at this court, the F Hospital at this court (the defendant hospital), the Yangsan University Hospital at Yangsan University Hospital at this court's inquiry results, the purport of the whole arguments, and the purport of the arguments.