Defendants shall be punished by imprisonment for eight months.

However, as to the Defendants for two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

The Defendants, “2012 Godan111,” in collusion, forged and exercised five copies of documents in the name of D, a private document concerning a certificate of fact as follows, for the purpose of uttering.

1. “A certificate of severance from employment” dated March 15, 2011

A. On March 15, 2011, the Defendants indicated “A”, “(State)F”, and “Representative D” in the name of the Ministry of Trade, Industry and Energy’s name in the name of the Ministry of Trade, Industry and Energy and attached the said FF company’s employee seal on the name of the Ministry of Trade, Industry and Energy, using the paper pen in the form of confirmation of severance from employment of the insured.

As a result, the Defendants forged one copy of the certificate of severance from employment of the insured under the name of D, which is a private document of fact certification, for the purpose of uttering in collusion.

B. The Defendants conspired to use the forged certificate of severance from employment of the insured to a public official belonging to the Ministry of Employment and Labor who is aware of the forgery at the Central Employment and Labor Office of Jung-dong-gu in the same time-dong-si at the same time, as if it were a document duly formed.

2. “Written Request for Correction of Insured Status Report” and “Report on Acquisition of Insured Status” as of April 29, 2011

A. At the foregoing F office around April 29, 201, the Defendants conspiredd to enter “G”, “H(H)”, and “FD” in the column for correction after the correction of the details of the insured’s name, and sealed the name of the workplace (representative), following the said D name to the employees of the said F company.

The Defendants continued to use the “Report on Acquisition of Insured Status” in the “Report on the Acquisition of Insured Status” as “(P) Representative Director D” in the insurance business agency column, and affixed a seal to the said F company’s employee seal next to the name.

As a result, the Defendants conspired to exercise a certificate of fact.