1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. On August 4, 2009, the Plaintiff was suffering from the wounds of “domination” while serving in the Army, and applied for registration to the Defendant on September 3, 2013. However, on February 12, 2014, the Defendant rendered a decision that the Plaintiff does not constitute a person of distinguished service to the State or a person eligible for veteran’s compensation on the ground that there is no proximate causal relation between the Plaintiff and the military performance of official duties (hereinafter “instant disposition”).

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap 1, Eul 1 and 2, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Whether the disposition is lawful;

A. On September 2009, the Plaintiff asserted that he had been under the diagnosis of the “porizontal escape certificate and spinebrate (L5-S1)” (hereinafter “L5-S1”) (hereinafter “the instant wound”) as a result of a regular leave of absence and a regular leave of absence, the Plaintiff was discharged from military service after being under the diagnosis of the injury.

In light of these circumstances, the instant difference is unlawful even if proximate causal relation is recognized with the military performance of official duties.

나. 관계 법령 ▣ 국가유공자 등 예우 및 지원에 관한 법률 제4조(적용 대상 국가유공자) ① 다음 각 호의 어느 하나에 해당하는 국가유공자, 그 유족 또는 가족(다른 법률에서 이 법에 규정 된 예우 등을 받도록 규정된 사람을 포함한다)은 이 법에 따른 예우를 받는다.

6. 공상군경 : 군인이나 경찰ㆍ소방 공무원으로서 국가의 수호ㆍ안전보장 또는 국민의 생명ㆍ재산 보호와 직접적인 관련이 있는 직무수행이나 교육훈련 중 상이(질병을 포함한다)를 입고 전역하 거나 퇴직한 사람으로서 그 상이정도가 국가보훈처장이 실시하는 신체검사에서 상이등급으로 판정된 사람 ▣ 보훈보상대상자 지원에 관한 법률 제2조(적용 대상 보훈보상대상자) ① 다음 각 호의 어느...