1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. On May 14, 1998, the Plaintiff entered the Army and served in the Army (hereinafter “instant wounds”) and filed an application for registration of persons who have rendered distinguished services to the Defendant on August 14, 2014. However, on March 13, 2015, the Defendant rendered a decision that the instant wound against the Plaintiff does not constitute a person who rendered distinguished services to the State or a person eligible for veteran’s compensation on the ground that there is no proximate causal relation with the military performance of official duties (hereinafter “instant disposition”).

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, entry Eul 1 and 2, purport of the whole pleadings

2. Whether the disposition is lawful;

A. In light of the fact that the Plaintiff’s nature at the time of the Plaintiff’s assertion of military service is so severe that the Plaintiff was unable to adapt properly to the military life, and thus, the Plaintiff was suffering from mental illness other than the Plaintiff’s family member, and there was no person suffering from the Plaintiff’s work, among the Plaintiff’s family members, and there was an act of rescue between the Plaintiff and the sick and wounded in the military, the instant disposition was unlawful even if proximate causal relation between the instant wounds and the performance of official duties is recognized.

나. 관계 법령 ▣ 국가유공자 등 예우 및 지원에 관한 법률 제4조(적용 대상 국가유공자) ① 다음 각 호의 어느 하나에 해당하는 국가유공자, 그 유족 또는 가족(다른 법률에서 이 법에 규정 된 예우 등을 받도록 규정된 사람을 포함한다)은 이 법에 따른 예우를 받는다.

6. 공상군경 : 군인이나 경찰ㆍ소방 공무원으로서 국가의 수호ㆍ안전보장 또는 국민의 생명ㆍ재산 보호와 직접적인 관련이 있는 직무수행이나 교육훈련 중 상이(질병을 포함한다)를 입고 전역하 거나 퇴직한 사람으로서 그 상이정도가 국가보훈처장이 실시하는 신체검사에서 상이등급으로 판정된 사람 ▣ 보훈보상대상자 지원에 관한 법률 제2조 적용 대상...