1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. On July 26, 1988, the Plaintiff was suffering from the wounds of head(s) while serving in the Army (hereinafter “instant wounds”) and applied for registration of persons who rendered distinguished services to the Defendant on December 29, 2014. However, on August 6, 2015, the Defendant rendered a decision that the instant difference does not constitute a person who rendered distinguished services to the State or a person eligible for veteran’s compensation on the ground that there is no proximate causal relation with the military performance of official duties (hereinafter “instant disposition”).

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap 1 and Eul 1, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Whether the disposition is lawful;

A. In light of the fact that the plaintiff's assertion was conducted as the plaintiff's leader before entering the army, and was judged as Grade 1 in the physical examination for conscription, although the plaintiff's nature was proved to have a result after entering the army, the plaintiff complained of mental suffering, was diagnosed by the military hospital, and was diagnosed by the difference in this case at the military hospital, and that the plaintiff's service unit was under excessive duty due to frequent boundary in the front bank, there is a proximate causal relation between the difference in this case and the military service, but the disposition of this case by the defendant is unlawful.

나. 관계 법령 ▣ 국가유공자 등 예우 및 지원에 관한 법률 제4조(적용 대상 국가유공자) ① 다음 각 호의 어느 하나에 해당하는 국가유공자, 그 유족 또는 가족(다른 법률에서 이 법에 규정 된 예우 등을 받도록 규정된 사람을 포함한다)은 이 법에 따른 예우를 받는다.

6. 공상군경 : 군인이나 경찰ㆍ소방 공무원으로서 국가의 수호ㆍ안전보장 또는 국민의 생명ㆍ재산 보호와 직접적인 관련이 있는 직무수행이나 교육훈련 중 상이(질병을 포함한다)를 입고 전역하 거나 퇴직한 사람으로서 그 상이정도가 국가보훈처장이 실시하는 신체검사에서 상이등급으로 판정된 사람 ▣ 보훈보상대상자 지원에...