1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. On November 15, 2011, the Plaintiff entered the Army and served in the Army. On February 28, 2013, the Plaintiff suffered from the wounds of the “large Hemal Hemal Hemosis” (hereinafter “the instant wound”), and filed for registration with the Defendant on February 28, 2013. However, on August 21, 2013, the Defendant rendered a decision that the instant wound does not constitute the requirements for persons who rendered distinguished services to the State and persons eligible for veteran’s compensation on the ground that there is no proximate causal relation with the military duty (hereinafter “instant disposition”).

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, entry Eul 1 and 2, purport of the whole pleadings

2. Whether the disposition is lawful;

A. Although the Plaintiff’s assertion was a physical health condition before entering the Plaintiff, there was an excessive fluoral military training in the three new soldiers training team and the Gu newsletter that received the basic military training, and the injury of this case occurred due to the failure to receive appropriate treatment thereafter.

In light of these circumstances, the instant disposition is unlawful even if proximate causal relation is recognized between the instant difference and the military service.

나. 관계 법령 ▣ 국가유공자 등 예우 및 지원에 관한 법률 제4조(적용 대상 국가유공자) ① 다음 각 호의 어느 하나에 해당하는 국가유공자, 그 유족 또는 가족(다른 법률에서 이 법에 규정 된 예우 등을 받도록 규정된 사람을 포함한다)은 이 법에 따른 예우를 받는다.

6. 공상군경 : 군인이나 경찰ㆍ소방 공무원으로서 국가의 수호ㆍ안전보장 또는 국민의 생명ㆍ재산 보호와 직접적인 관련이 있는 직무수행이나 교육훈련 중 상이(질병을 포함한다)를 입고 전역하 거나 퇴직한 사람으로서 그 상이정도가 국가보훈처장이 실시하는 신체검사에서 상이등급으로 판정된 사람 ▣ 보훈보상대상자 지원에 관한 법률 제2조(적용 대상 보훈보상대상자) ① 다음 각 호의 어느 하나에 해당하는 보훈보상대상자, 그...