logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
red_flag_2
(영문) 대전고등법원 2011. 8. 26. 선고 2010나8097 판결
[영업행위금지청구][미간행]
Plaintiff and appellant

Plaintiff (Law Firm Shin, Attorneys Yoon Byung-gu et al., Counsel for the plaintiff-appellant)

Defendant, Appellant

Defendant (Attorney Han-chul et al., Counsel for defendant-appellee)

The first instance judgment

Daejeon District Court Decision 2010Gahap3067 Decided October 29, 2010

Conclusion of Pleadings

July 8, 2011

Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

The judgment of the first instance shall be revoked. The defendant shall not engage in pharmacy business in subparagraph 1-1-2 of the fifth floor among the buildings listed in the attached list.

Reasons

This Court's reasoning is the same as the entry of the first instance court's decision, except for deletion of the part concerning the overall protection in the first instance court's No. 7, No. 11, No. 13, the first instance court's decision.

Therefore, the judgment of the first instance court is legitimate, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.

[Attachment]

Judges Kim Yong-dae (Presiding Judge)

arrow