beta
Plaintiff and appellant
School Foundation or Mine Institute (Attorney Cho Jae-in, Counsel for the defendant-appellant)
Defendant, Appellant
Defendant (Attorney Hun-Ba et al., Counsel for the defendant-appellant)
Conclusion of Pleadings
August 17, 2011
The first instance judgment
Daejeon District Court Decision 2009Da12447 Decided February 17, 201
Text
1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.
2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
Purport of claim and appeal
The judgment of the first instance is revoked. The defendant shall pay to the plaintiff 1,00,000,000 won with interest of 20% per annum from the day following the delivery of the complaint of this case to the day of complete payment.
Reasons
The court's explanation on the instant case is identical to the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance and the week 1). Thus, this is cited in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.
Therefore, the judgment of the court of first instance is just, and the plaintiff's appeal against it is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.
Judges Kim Yong-dae (Presiding Judge)
1) The plaintiff asserts that the judgment of the court of first instance has neglected the judgment on the part of the claim for consolation money, which is the damage suffered by the plaintiff due to the defendant's tort. However, the judgment of the court of first instance recognized the fact that the plaintiff was aware of or was not suspected of having committed a crime against the defendant's act of defamation due to the plaintiff's defamation from the 1.e., the judgment of the court of first instance, and that the judgment of the court of first instance did not recognize the plaintiff's claim for consolation money amounting to 100,000,000 won, which is the damage suffered by the plaintiff due to the plaintiff's damage of the plaintiff's social reputation and credit, after organizing the plaintiff's claim for consolation money amounting to 10,00,000 won due to the plaintiff's damage of the plaintiff's social reputation and credit, the judgment of the court of first instance did not constitute a tort that should be individually