beta
Plaintiff, Appellant
Dacro Co., Ltd. (Law Firm Lowsty, Attorneys Yellow-ho et al., Counsel for defendant-appellant)
Defendant, appellant and appellant
The head of Seongbuk-gu Daejeon Metropolitan City U.S. (Law Firm Seo-ho, Attorney Kim Young-chul, Counsel for defendant-appellant
Conclusion of Pleadings
December 19, 2013
The first instance judgment
Daejeon District Court Decision 2013Guhap484 Decided October 16, 2013
Text
1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.
2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.
Purport of claim and appeal
1. Purport of claim
The defendant's rejection disposition against the plaintiff on December 24, 2012 shall be revoked.
2. Purport of appeal
The judgment of the first instance is revoked. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.
Reasons
1. Quotation of judgment of the first instance;
The court's explanation on the instant case is identical to the part of the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, and thus, citing it as it is by Article 8 (2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.
2. Conclusion
Therefore, the judgment of the court of first instance is just based on its conclusion, and the defendant's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.
Judge Lee Jin-hun (Presiding Judge)