A defendant shall be punished by a fine of 500,000 won.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is a person who engages in labor at the site of the construction of a commercial building in Seo-gu Daejeon D.

1. On October 1, 2013, the Defendant, at the above construction site around 13:00 on October 1, 2013, stolen the amount equivalent to KRW 10 meters owned by the victimized Company E, Inc. and approximately 162,800,000,000,000,000,000 in total, on the F Poter freight vehicles at the scene, by carrying them on the F Poter freight vehicles;

2. The Defendant, at around 14:00 on the date of the same month, took place in the same place, in the same manner, approximately 148,00 km (200 km market value) and in the same place, in the same manner.

3. On the 21st day of the same month, the Defendant, at the same place around 16:30m, took the same method in a size equal to about 10m, 13m, 19m and 22m iron bars worth KRW 296,00,00; and

4. On the 31st day of the same month, the Defendant stolen the steel bars equivalent to KRW 636,40,00 in total, on four occasions, including, at the same place, about about 40 km (40 km) the market price of approximately 29,600 km in the same manner.

Summary of Evidence

1. Each legal statement of witness G, H and I;

1. Details and application of each statute to photographs;

1. Article 329 of the Criminal Act and Article 329 of the Criminal Act concerning the applicable criminal facts and the choice of fines;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Judgment on the assertion by the defendant and his/her defense counsel under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act

1. The alleged defendant did not commit theft of the iron bars owned by the victimized company, and even if there was no permission from the chief of the J company’s site office and the victimized company, and thus, the crime of larceny is not established.

2. Determination

A. First, in full view of the following facts, the Defendant’s theft of the steel bars owned by the victimized company as stated in the facts charged, the fact that the Defendant stolen the steel bars owned by the victimized company as stated in the facts charged is sufficiently recognized.

(1) A witness G or H shall steals the steel bars, as shown in the facts charged, by the defendant in this court.