logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 안산지원 2016.03.23 2016고정201
사문서위조등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,500,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Criminal facts

On March 26, 2015, the Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for larceny, etc. on the support of the method of flood control, and the judgment became final and conclusive on April 3, 2015.

1. On February 2, 2015, the Defendant: (a) discovered image files of the driver’s license which the victim C opened on the past personal homepage through the NAV search function of the unit B apartment B, Ansan-si, the Defendant’s residence; (b) obtained the image files of the driver’s license which the victim C opened on the previous personal homepage; and (c) took them over on the computer; (d) attached the Defendant’s photograph with the Defendant’s photograph attached on the victim’s photograph using the NAP program; and (e) stored them on the Defendant’s mobile phone.

On February 27, 2015, the Defendant continuously presented a driver’s license photograph under the name of the victim at the office of the branch office (ju) in Mapo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, the Defendant, as seen above, stated the victim’s resident number, driver’s license number, address, etc. in the column of the lessee of the vehicle lease contract, and the Defendant stated the lessee’s signature of the vehicle lease contract and the vehicle damage exemption column in the name and sealed the vehicle.

For the purpose of uttering, the Defendant forged a vehicle rental contract in the name of the victim, which is a private document on rights and obligations.

2. On February 27, 2015, the Defendant exercised the said investigation document as if it were a document that duly formed a forged vehicle lease contract, such as the document described in paragraph 1, at the office of the branch office in Mapo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government (State) and the office of the branch office in Mapo-gu, Seoul.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police against C;

1. Each report on internal investigation:

1. Request for cooperation in the business affairs of a stock company (Yewon Bascar);

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to inquiries, such as criminal history;

1. Article 231 of the Criminal Act (the point of Article 231 of the Private Document) and Article 234 of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts.

arrow