logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 안산지원 2017.08.16 2017고단1231
사기등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than one year and six months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[criminal record] On June 19, 2015, the Defendant was sentenced to one year of imprisonment with prison labor for occupational embezzlement in the Sungnam branch of Suwon branch of Suwon, and the judgment became final and conclusive on June 27, 2015.

[2] The Defendant is a person who had been working as the head of the management department in D LLC operated by the victim C from June 2013 to November 2014.

1. Around June 2013, the Defendant of a private document forgery: (a) in China, it is difficult for an individual to rent a vehicle from the rental company; (b) while the corporation, without the consent of the said C, leased the vehicle in the name of the said construction work using the head of the said construction work, which was kept in the office of the D Limited Liability Company without the consent of the lessee of the vehicle; and (c) was willing to lend money to a third party.

Accordingly, around June 16, 2013, the Defendant attached the seal impression of the said Corporation to the lessee column of the FF Limited Company’s lease contract where the vehicle number, lease period, etc. of the Defendant’s land (hereinafter referred to as the “Defendant”) possessed by the Defendant at the time of Scheon-si in China, and the said E entered into a lease contract with the said F Limited Company for three years of lease period for GYF Layst and other vehicles, and the Defendant attached the said lease contract with the said F Company and attached the said vehicle number, lease period, etc.

Accordingly, the Defendant forged a vehicle lease contract under the name of D Limited Liability Corporation, a private document on rights and obligations for the purpose of uttering.

The Defendant, including that, from around that time to November 1, 2014, forged a vehicle lease contract under the name of D limited company by the same method 27 times in total, such as the list of crimes in the attached list of crimes.

2. On June 16, 2013, the Defendant at the event of the foregoing investigation document: (a) signed the vehicle lease agreement with D limited liability company’s seal impression on the vehicle lease agreement as set forth in paragraph (1), and submitted the forged document under the name of D limited liability company, which is a private document, by allowing a rental car company that was not aware of the forged fact through the above E to submit it to an employee under the name of F. F. corporation with limited liability.

arrow