All appeals by the Defendants are dismissed.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. The Defendants A and B refer to the following: (a) Defendant A and B’s debate by the employees participating in the interview and interview after having interview in the first camp (the Defendants and the employees of the personnel division of the FF bank refer to the interview procedure.

The Defendants’ act did not constitute the crime of interference with business because the Defendants calculated the final score by comprehensively taking account of various personnel policy factors, such as sex, proportional distribution by university and college, local relationship, veterans affairs, health, etc. within the scope of the F Bank’s authority to employ new applicants, and subsequently did not constitute the crime of interference with business because the Defendants did not receive any illegal solicitation related to employment and did not change the interview points for the interest of the F Bank. (2) Defendant D did not intend to commit the crime of interference with business because the Defendants did not obtain some interview points from the F Bank for the benefit of the F Bank, and found that there was a low need to pass the second interview points from the F Bank, and subsequently failed to meet the requirement of the F Bank to obtain some interview points from the F Bank’s first and second interview, and the Defendants did not have any error in the interview with the F Bank’s duty, which was found to have been found to have been found to have been due to the absence of the F Bank’s authority to make a corrective interview.

3) Defendant CA), due to Defendant D’s error in the evaluation of interviewers, the Defendant scores R’s interview points.