logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 2019.06.18 2018노4739
업무방해
Text

The judgment of the court below is reversed.

The defendant is innocent. The summary of this judgment shall be notified publicly.

Reasons

1. The summary of the facts charged is that the Defendant served as the head of the personnel management division from September 1, 2016 to January 28, 2018, and was released from his position on January 29, 2018.

In November 23, 2016, the Corporation has formulated a plan for employment examination in order to employ one records management personnel, who are in an indefinite contract-based contract-based contract-based contract-based contract-based contract-based contract-based contract-based contract-based contract-based contract-based contract-based contract-based contract-based contract-based contract-based contract-based contract-based contract-based contract-based contract-based contract-based contract-based contract-based contract-based contract-based contract-based contract-based contract-based contract-based

Accordingly, the Corporation decided six applicants from among the applicants in accordance with the above implementation plan as successful applicants, and recorded the first and second of the second of the interview score as 127 points among the above successful applicants, and the second of the interview score as 125 points.

(D) The document review scores of D and E are the same as 82.88 points). The Defendant, according to the above results, determined D as the final successful candidate and reported it to the trading company. However, around December 2016, the Defendant, within the office of the administrative management division of the Corporation, stated the document review scores, which are not the final results (documents, interviews, comprehensive interview points) of the applicants, and written the document review scores, which are not the interview scores of the applicants, and then, notified the executive management officer F, G, and H, who is the senior personnel management officer in charge of personnel affairs, by making a false report to F, G, and H, who received their final approval, and E passed the employment examination.

As a result, E was determined as a successful candidate on December 21, 2016, and was appointed as an indefinite contract position of the public corporation.

Accordingly, the defendant is employed by the Corporation through fraudulent means.

arrow