logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 2019.05.16 2018고단5403
업무방해등
Text

Defendant

A shall be punished by a fine for negligence of KRW 5,000,000, and by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.

Defendant

A above.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A, from August 3, 2015 to July 31, 2017, from Gangnam-gu Seoul building C, was in charge of the duties of employment of employees while serving as the head of the management support headquarters, and Defendant B is a corporation established on September 14, 2009 for the purpose of installment financial business, etc.

1. Defendant A

A. The three-year employment procedures for major employees, i.e., the three-year employment procedures for major employees, i.e., the three-year employment procedures for major employees, i., the receipt of applications from November 19, 2015 to November 29, 2015; (ii) the document screening from November 30, 2015 to December 2, 2015; (iii) the first interview from December 9, 2015 to December 11, 2015; and (iv) the second interview from December 16, 2015 to December 17, 2015 to December 18, 2015; and (v) the documents from the date of graduation to the date of the final announcement on December 18, 2015; and (v) the documents from the year of graduation to the date of the first half, 25%, 20%, 204%, and 5% of his/her certificate of qualification.

At the beginning of December 2015, when the document screening period was in force, the Defendant instructed the head of the construction machinery team D to pass an interview with the head of the construction machinery team “E, who is the child of the president of the transaction center, takes the application, and if the document screening type was removed from the document screening, he will not go back until the interview,” and notified E, who did not pass the document screening type, failed to pass the document screening type, to pass an interview with the head of the personnel affairs team leader, and the F again instructed the head of the personnel affairs team G to the same purport, and accordingly, he operated the document screening point of 90.5 points (the certificate of qualification from 16 points to 20 points, and 40.5 points to 45 points to 16 points to 40.5 points to 99 points to 99 points to 99 points to 99 points to 90.5 points to 16 points to 16 points to 40.5 points to 45 points to 195 points to 1).

Since then, at the first interview conducted from December 9, 2015 to December 11, 2015, the Defendant had an interview member H, I, J, and K, who was unaware of such circumstances, had the interview member, I, J, and K undergo the first interview in a normal document screening process.

arrow