A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is a person who served as the president of B Corporation from September 26, 201 to February 20, 2014.

1. The 201. In order to recruit new employees in 2012, the 201. Around October 27, 2011, the 201. Around October 27, 2011, the 201. Around December 14, 201, the 201. Around December 14, 201, the 201. Around December 14, 201, the 201.

On December 19, 2011, the Defendant received a report from the Defendant’s office located in the sixth floor of the Yeongdeungpo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government building C, stating that “The head of the planning and coordination office E applies for voluntary retirement and the head of the planning and coordination office E is required to fill the vacancy, and the Defendant is required to additionally employ the F with the highest interview score from among those who failed to pass the business division.”

Accordingly, the Defendant is aware of the fact that the successful applicants of the new recruitment examination under the Regulations on Personnel Affairs of the above Corporation should determine the interview scores in the order of the highest score of the interview scores among the successful applicants of the document screening and the written examination, and whether the above D would be better than the H University.

In view of the interview attitude, whether the officer of the Corporation (at least seven interview rankings) I does not meet the F more than the officer of the Corporation (at least six interview rankings)

“In doing so, I was instructed to employ I while doing so.”

D, around December 19, 201, at the office of the fifth floor of the building C above, D ordered J, the personnel of the said office and the head of the said office, to “to newly employ I as new staff.” On the same day, J changed the interview score of the above F, which was stored in the X-cell file using a computer, from 419.6 to 416.8, and changed the interview score of the above I from 415.8 to 418.6, while changing the interview score of the interview score of the interview commissioner, at the interview point from 88 to 86, and at the interview point from 90 to 89.

The following D is the same as above.