logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 울산지방법원 2019.11.22 2019고단263
도로교통법위반(음주운전)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for not more than ten months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[Criminal Power] On November 1, 2017, the Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for one year for a violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes, etc. at the Ulsan District Court, and the sentence was finalized on November 9, 2017.

【Criminal Facts】

1. Around 00:55 on November 13, 2018, the Defendant driving a F rocketing car under the influence of alcohol concentration of about 1km without obtaining a driver’s license from the front side of the “Camnob bank” located in Ulsan-gu B to the front side of the “E” located in Ulsan-gu, Ulsan-gu, Seoul-do, and without obtaining a driver’s license from the 1km section, and without obtaining a driver’s license, while under the influence of alcohol concentration of 0.156%.

2. On November 13, 2018, the Defendant of the electronic records, etc., the following: (a) on the roads located in Ulsan-gu, Ulsan-gu, Seoul-gu, “E” on November 13, 2018, the Defendant: (b) was an I resident registration number (J) in mind that the Defendant, who was requested from Ulsan-nam Police Station G, and a slope H, to take a drinking measurement in front of the “E” on the roads located in Ulsan-gu, Ulsan-gu; and (c) the Defendant, who was in common, had the mind that the Defendant would have been able to do so as to do so; and (d) the Defendant, who was asked from slope G, to sign on the driver confirmation column of the “PDA” with respect to I entered in the portable police information terminal (PDA); and (e) was asked to confirm and sign the above fact without doubt; and (e) then, (e) the Defendant presented I’s signature on the side of the “A driver I” and presented the said G certification to the said person’s signature.

As a result, the Defendant forged the part of the driver’s confirmation under the “A” name, which is a prior record of the certification of facts, for the purpose of hindering the management of affairs, and exercised it.

3. The Defendant forged a private document, and uttering of a private document, at the time, place, and place specified in paragraph 2, and at the place, the “report on the statement of the principal driver’s political opinion” from a slope H.

arrow