logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원순천지원 2020.11.18 2020고단712
도로교통법위반(음주운전)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for two years.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for three years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Criminal facts

On August 24, 2007, the Defendant issued a summary order of KRW 2 million for the crime of violation of the Road Traffic Act at the Daegu District Court and KRW 4 million for the same crime at the same court on February 9, 2015.

1. Around 22:00 on February 20, 2020, the Defendant driven Bk7 car while under the influence of alcohol with approximately 0.157% alcohol concentration at a distance of about 2.2 km from the commercial building located in Gwangjin-si, Mayang-si to the dong located in the eastyang-si, Mayang-si located in the east-si, Mayang-si.

2. On February 22, 2020, the Defendant violated the Resident Registration Act at around 22:15, the Defendant entered the above site and demanded a presentation of his identification card by the Assistant Police Station C (a police box) affiliated with a police box of the Mineyang Police Station to present his/her identification card, and the Defendant’s friendly birth (F) who was known in advance.

Accordingly, the defendant used another person's resident registration number unlawfully.

3. At around 22:48 on the same day as indicated in paragraph (2), the Defendant requested that he sign the “Notice of the Results of Drinking Driving Control” to E, which is entered into a police portable information terminal (hereinafter “PDA”), which is controlled by drinking driving, and entered into the above D’s portable information terminal (hereinafter “PDA”), and issued the E’s digital signature in the above notice, and then issued it to the above D as if he was genuine.

As a result, with the aim of hindering administrative affairs, the Defendant forged the “Notice of Regulatory Results” in the name of E, a prior recording of a certificate of fact, and exercised it.

4. The accused of forging private documents and uttering of a falsified investigation document are regulated by drinking driving at the time and place specified in paragraph (3) and the name of the “written report on the circumstantial statement of a drinking driver” and the “written consent to driving” from the aforementioned D.

arrow