logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2020.04.29 2019고단7507
사문서위조등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On August 17, 2018, the Defendant was issued a summary order of KRW 4 million by the Jeju District Court as a crime of violating the Road Traffic Act.

On October 6, 2019, at around 01:15, the Defendant driven a B-owned car under the influence of alcohol content of 0.039% without obtaining a driving license from around 1.5 km section to the roads adjacent to the access road to the Nowon-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, Dongjak-gu, Seoul, to the 322-3 Olympic Road, Dongjak-gu, Seoul Metropolitan Government.

As a result, the defendant did not obtain a driver's license, and at the same time violated the prohibition of drinking driving more than twice.

2. The Defendant’s unlawful uttering of official document was found at a time and place under Paragraph (1) and requested to present personal information from a slope D belonging to the Dongjak-gu Seoul Police Station C, and the Defendant had the mind that the Defendant would run as if he was the Defendant’s punishment E, and presented his driver’s license to E in his possession.

3. The Defendant, at the time, at the time, at the time, and place, Paragraph 1 of this Article, requested D to sign the driver’s confirmation column of “Notification on the Result of Sound Driving Regulations” with respect to E entered into a police portable information terminal (PDA), and the above inquiry was made with E’s signature on the side of the part indicated “A. A driver’s driver’s notice of the results of sound driving control,” and used a written confirmation of E’s name, which is a prior recording of the certification, from among “the notice of the results of sound driving control,” and with the signature of E’s signature on the same page of the same page.

As a result, the defendant has forged a written confirmation from among the notification of drinking driving control results in E, which is a prior record of a certificate of fact, for the purpose of hindering the management of affairs.

arrow