logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 2017.09.15 2017고단5748
사서명위조등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On July 9, 2017, around 01:25, the Defendant violated the Resident Registration Act: (a) around the Seo-gu Incheon, Seo-gu, Incheon, and the Defendant was arrested as a flagrant offender from E in the circumstances where the D District Unit of the Incheon Western Police Station D police station, which was dispatched to the case of assault against B, and (b) around the time prior to being out of the Republic of Korea, and (c) the name and resident registration number (G) of the Defendant-friendly F, who was out of the Republic of Korea, was sent to the above E

2. The Defendant forged the signature of the company and signed the above investigation at the time and place specified in the above 1.1. paragraph (1) of the same Article, and entered “F” in the column for the confirmation of a certificate of arrest of a flagrant offender with the intent of gathering the personal information of friendly F with the awareness of the fact that he was arrested in flagrant offender E, and issued the above certificate to H as if the above signature was duly formed.

Accordingly, for the purpose of exercising, the Defendant forged F’s signature and used forged F’s signature.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police with regard to F;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of written confirmation;

1. Article 37 subparagraph 10 of the relevant Act and Article 37 of the Act on the Registration of Residents of the Selection of Punishment (Unlawful Use of Resident Registration Number, Selection of Imprisonment), Article 239 (1) of the Criminal Act (the point of a signature of a company), Article 239 (2) and Article 239 (1) of the Criminal Act (the point of exercising a signature of the above investigation) concerning criminal facts;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. The suspended sentence recognizes and reflects the crime for the reason of sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act, the defendant's punishment is not sought by the Dong F ( not the relative living together) who is the victim (the victim is not the relative living together), the defendant has no same record (no record of crime exceeding the fine since 200), and all other facts revealed in this case, such as the defendant's age, sex behavior, environment, and circumstances after the crime.

arrow