logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 청주지방법원 영동지원 2013.07.25 2013재고단1
횡령등
Text

The defendant shall be innocent.

Reasons

The summary of the facts charged in this case is as follows.

on March 9, 2012, 2012, the Defendant embezzled the said physical card by failing to return it to the victim, even if he/she withdraws the cash to be paid at the drinking value from the victim E, the customer, from the “D” club, which he/she works as his/her employee in the Chungcheongnam-gun, Chungcheongnam-gun, Chungcheongnam-do.

A. At around 01:38 on March 10, 2012, the Defendant: (a) released and stolen KRW 8.5 million on four occasions at the F convenience store located in the Chungcheongnam-gun, Chungcheongnam-gun; (b) by inserting the said card into a cash withdrawal machine managed by the Agricultural Cooperative of the Victim No. 1, the said convenience store; and (c) inputting the password. (c) On March 10, 2012, the Defendant removed and stolen the said card. (d) On March 21, 2012, the Defendant transferred the said card to the Agricultural Cooperative account in G name, which is located in the Geumcheon-gun, Macheon-gun, Macheon-gun, Incheon-do, by inserting the said card into a cash withdrawal machine managed by the said Livestock Cooperative; and (d) withdrawn KRW 1 million in cash and stolen it.

3) On March 11, 2012, around 19:57, the suspect: (a) posted the said card in a cash withdrawal machine managed by the Livestock Cooperative for the victim; and (b) withdrawn KRW 1.6 million on three occasions by entering the password. The Defendant, as stated in the facts charged, asserts that he/she was guilty of false confession by his/her employee upon the request of the JJ, who committed the crime, even though he/she did not receive cash withdrawal or account transfer with the customer card, as stated in the facts charged, even though he/she did not have any receipt of cash withdrawal or account transfer with the customer card. The Defendant denies the charges by asserting that he/she was guilty upon the request of the said JJ that he/she used the said customer card. According to the dialogue between the Defendant and the JK, the Defendant and his/her husband, as alleged by the Defendant, committed the crime in fact, as alleged by the Defendant.

arrow