Plaintiff and appellant
Law Firm Seosan
Defendant, Appellant
(2) The Minister of Justice (Attorney Choi Jong-chul et al., Counsel for defendant-appellant)
The third party intervenor in the lawsuit
The third party intervenor in the lawsuit
Conclusion of Pleadings
March 22, 2018
The first instance judgment
Seoul Administrative Court Decision 2017Guhap64996 decided November 10, 2017
Text
1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.
2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff, including the costs of intervention in the lawsuit.
Purport of claim and appeal
The judgment of the first instance is revoked. The defendant's disposition of return of the application for authorization to the plaintiff on May 18, 2017 shall be revoked.
Reasons
1. cite the reasoning of the judgment of the first instance;
The reasoning of this Court is that the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance is the same as that of the judgment of the court of first instance. Thus, this Court cites the reasoning pursuant to Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and the main text of
2. Conclusion
Since the judgment of the first instance is justifiable, the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit.
Judges gate Charter (Presiding Judge)