Plaintiff, Appellant
Plaintiff (Attorney Seo-soo et al., Counsel for plaintiff-appellant)
Defendant, appellant and appellant
Korea Labor Welfare Corporation
Conclusion of Pleadings
March 8, 2018
The first instance judgment
Seoul Administrative Court Decision 2017Guhap50287 decided October 20, 2017
Text
1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.
2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.
Purport of claim and appeal
1. Purport of claim
On July 12, 2017, the Defendant revoked the disposition of site payment for unpaid insurance benefits against the Plaintiff.
2. Purport of appeal
The judgment of the first instance is revoked. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.
Reasons
1. Quotation of judgment of the first instance;
The reasoning of the judgment of this court is as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for adding "This Court" to "Seoul Administrative Court" at the 3rd bottom of the judgment of the court of first instance, "If the worker leaves a workplace where it is impossible to completely recover from pneumoconiosis due to modern medicine, it is difficult to expect the progress, while it is difficult to predict the degree of progress, and the specific disability grade is determined only after the specific procedure for determination, such as the review by the Pneumoconiosis Review Committee," and therefore, it is cited in accordance with Article 8 (2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.
2. Conclusion
Since the judgment of the first instance is justifiable, the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed as it is groundless.
Judges gate Charter (Presiding Judge)