beta
Plaintiff and appellant
[Defendant-Appellee] Plaintiff 1 (Attorney Gyeong-dae, Counsel for defendant-appellee)
Defendant, Appellant
Private School Staff Pension Corporation (Government Law Firm Corporation, Attorneys Choi Woo-chul, Counsel for defendant-appellant)
Conclusion of Pleadings
September 4, 2014
The first instance judgment
Daejeon District Court Decision 2013Da22758 Decided April 24, 2014
Text
1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.
2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
Purport of claim and appeal
The judgment of the first instance court is revoked. It is confirmed that the plaintiff's obligation to the defendant 3,953,330 won based on the repayment of the aggregate amount to be returned on March 29, 2013 and the settlement based on the decision to recover the monthly pension amount does not exist.
Reasons
1. Quotation of judgment of the first instance;
The reasoning of this Court’s explanation concerning this case is that the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance is as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for the dismissal of some of the judgment of the court of first instance as follows. Thus, it is acceptable in accordance with Article
Jin part
○ Each of the “50,700,080 won” in the second and third parallels 15 and 3 are considered to be “50,770,080 won.”
○ The 3rd page “12,593,200 won” is considered as “12,184,900 won.”
○ The 5th page “12,593,200 won” is “12,593,200 won (the sum of the above 12,184,900 won plus the interest 408,300 won).”
○ The 6th page 18 “Article 63” refers to “Article 64.”
○ The 7th page 1 referred to as “malone” is regarded as “Articles of Incorporation.”
○○ KRW 2,156,100, “2,100” of the 7th page 10 is regarded as “ KRW 1,234,320.”
○○ 7th page 12 “Plaintiff” is regarded as “Defendant”.
○○ Heading 13 of the 7th page “Defendant” refers to the Plaintiff as “the Plaintiff is the Defendant.”
2. Conclusion
Therefore, the judgment of the court of first instance is just in conclusion, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.
Judges Yang Tae-Gyeong (Presiding Judge) (Presiding Judge) Kim Jong-Un