2018Nu5781 Revocation, such as an order to refund expenses for workplace skill development training

1. A;

2. B

3. C.

4. D;

5. E.

6. F;

7. G.

8. H;

9. I

10. J

11, K

12. L.

13. M;

14.N

15.O

16. R

17. U;

18.W;

19, X

20. Y

21. AB

22. AD;

23. AF;

24. AG;

25. AK;

26. AL;

27,N

28. AP;

A Q. 29.

The head of the Central Local Employment and Labor Agency branch office

Suwon District Court Decision 2017Guhap60674 Decided July 3, 2018

November 15, 2018

December 13, 2018

1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

1. Purport of claim

The Defendant’s disposition on February 12, 2016 against Plaintiff A, K, X, Y, AG, AI, and AJ is revoked on February 17, 2016, respectively.

2. Purport of appeal

The part against the defendant in the judgment of the court of first instance shall be revoked, and all of the plaintiffs' claims corresponding to the revocation shall be dismissed.

1. Quotation of judgment of the first instance;

The grounds alleged by the defendant in the trial while filing an appeal do not differ from the contents alleged by the defendant in the first instance court, and even if the evidence submitted in the first instance court is re-examineed together with the allegations by the parties, the first instance judgment is justified.

Therefore, the court's explanation on the instant case is identical to the reasoning stated in the judgment of the court of first instance, and thus, it refers to the reasoning stated in Article 8 (2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and the main text of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act. The conclusion is 2.

Therefore, the judgment of the first instance court is just, and the defendant's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit.

The presiding judge, the whole judge;

Judges Min Il-young

Judges Lee Jae-in