2018Nu78611 Revocation of a disposition of revocation of reprimand

A

Law Firm Han-chul et al., Counsel for the plaintiff-appellant

Attorney Kim Il-tae, Attorney Kim Il-sik and Rina

Attorney Choi Ho-ho

The Minister of Culture, Sports and Tourism

Law Firm Han-tae, Counsel for the plaintiff-appellant

[Defendant-Appellee]

Seoul Administrative Court Decision 2018Guhap56640 decided November 30, 2018

May 30, 2019

June 20, 2019

1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

1. Purport of claim

The Defendant’s reprimand disposition against the Plaintiff on October 10, 2017 shall be revoked. 2. The purport of the appeal is revoked.

The judgment of the first instance is revoked. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

1. Quotation of judgment of the first instance;

The grounds alleged by the defendant in the trial while filing an appeal do not differ from the contents alleged by the defendant in the first instance court, and even if the evidence submitted in the first instance court is re-examineed along with the defendant's assertion, the judgment of the first instance court, which accepted the plaintiff'

Therefore, this court's reasoning is the same as the entry of the reasoning in the judgment of the court of first instance, and thus, it shall be quoted in accordance with Article 8 (2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

2. Conclusion

The decision of the first instance court is justifiable, and the defendant's appeal is dismissed as it is groundless.

The presiding judge, the whole judge;

Judges Min Il-young

Judge Lee Jin-hun