1. All appeals filed by the plaintiff (Counterclaim defendant) and the plaintiffs are dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal are assessed against the Plaintiff (Counterclaim Defendant).

1. The reasoning of the court's explanation concerning this case is as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for the following part of the judgment of the court of first instance 2, which is the same as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance. Thus, this is cited by the main sentence of Article 420 of

2. On Part 3, No. 16 of the part used in the appeal No. 3, “A judgment was rendered,” the judgment of conviction was rendered, and the judgment of the appellate court was rendered on October 10, 2012, and the judgment of the appellate court became final and conclusive as it is, even in the previous Jeju District Court 2012No784, which appealed by the Plaintiff A, with the aim of the appeal period.”

Part 4, "A. Determination" in Part 8 shall be made as follows:

B. Therefore, according to the records and images of evidence Nos. 9-3, 5, 12, 14, and 15 as of April 18, 201, as to whether the Defendants inflicted an injury on the Plaintiff, including the Plaintiff’s pathal design, etc., the Plaintiff’s 4, 5-1, 5-2, and 21 were included in the evidence Nos. 1, 5-2, and 21. However, even though it is recognized that the Plaintiff suffered an injury on the part of the Plaintiff A on April 18, 2011, the evidence of evidence Nos. 9-3, 5, 12, 14, and 15 is difficult to acknowledge that there was an injury on the part of the Plaintiff A, as of April 18, 201, and that there was a lack of evidence to acknowledge that there was an injury on the part of the Plaintiff A in the course of self-conceptioning the fact that the Plaintiff inflicted an injury on the Defendant D.

The calculation of the six pages 5 to 7 (b) shall be made in the following parts: (b) below the month of the calculation;