1. Of the judgment of the court of first instance, the part against the plaintiff corresponding to the money ordered to be paid in addition to the following shall be revoked.

1. The reasoning of the court's explanation concerning this case is as follows, and this part of the judgment of the court of first instance is as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except where part of the judgment of the court of first instance is used as follows. Thus, this is accepted in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420

2. Of the reasons for the final judgment of the first instance court, the part written after the dismissal “Plaintiff A” shall be deemed to be “Plaintiff”, “Plaintiff B” to “B”, and “Plaintiff C” to “C”, respectively.

The "(Plaintiff A)" referred to in each item of paragraph (2) shall be deleted from among the reasons for the judgment of the first instance.

Part 3 of the reasons for the judgment of the first instance court, the grounds for recognition under paragraph 2 shall be as follows:

In the absence of any dispute, "attached Form 1 Calculation Schedule" in Part 8 of the judgment of the first instance court, "In the event that there is no dispute, Gap evidence 9 through 13, Eul evidence 8, and the results of physical commission and fact inquiry of the director of the Seoul Escartol Hospital at the court of first instance, the purport of the whole pleadings," and "attached Form 2 future treatment costs" in Form 9, "attached Form 3 supplementary aid damages shall be replaced by the following table:

The 3 to 5th parallels of the decision of the first instance shall be conducted in the following manner:

“4) Calculation: Calculation: Attached Form 1: 4(c) of the first instance judgment of the court of first instance (the daily income shall be calculated by deducting the amount equivalent to 1/3 of the income from the date following the end of the pleadings from March 30, 2048 to June 22, 2051) as indicated in the “actual income” column for the calculation of damages in attached Table 1, 490,767,751 (the daily income from March 30, 2048 to June 22, 2051, which is the expiration date of the operating period). “The date following the day of the closing of pleadings, July 31, 2015” shall be read as “the day following the day following the day of the closing of pleadings at the trial,” respectively, and the portion of the last execution calculation shall be written as follows: 4.00,097, 0333rd of the judgment of the court of first instance.”

Of the auxiliary exit expenses in paragraph 4, the 4th period " July 31, 2015, which is the day following the closing date of pleadings" shall be used as " August 31, 2016, which is the day following the day following the closing date of pleadings at the trial," and the calculation of the 7th period.