1. Of the judgment of the court of first instance, the part against the plaintiffs falling under the following order shall be revoked.

1. The reasoning of the court’s explanation concerning this case is as follows: (a) the part of “paragraph (3)” in the part No. 7 of the first instance judgment No. 3 is used or added as set forth in the following Paragraph (2); and (b) the part newly asserted by the Defendant in the trial is identical to the reasoning of the first instance judgment, and thus, it is cited by applying the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

2.The portion of "a. treatment costs" used in the afterma shall be dried as follows:

A. According to the statements in evidence No. 9-6 to 13, 16 through 35, 11-1 to 3, 15, and 16 of the evidence No. 9-6, 16-35, and 16, the plaintiff A may recognize that the plaintiff spent the total amount of KRW 6,390,005 (=the total amount of KRW 6,080,005 (wheel chairs) for the medical expenses incurred from the accident of this case until the date of closing argument of this case).

(d) The portion of the "routing expenses" shall be filled by the following:

In full view of the necessity and degree of opening 1) the statement of Nos. 10-1, 2, 12-1 through 13, 14-1 of the evidence Nos. 10-1, 14-1 of the evidence Nos. 10-1, 14 of the court of first instance, and the results of fact inquiry about the head of the Sincheon National University University University and the head of the E Hospital, and the results of fact inquiry about the head of the E Hospital added in the court of first instance, it is determined that it is impossible for the Plaintiff A to perform basic daily life for a total of 396 days as follows, and to take care of the Plaintiff A, 12 days in total for the period of hospitalization at the F Hospital from August 7, 2014 to August 18, 2014; the extent of the Plaintiff’s admission to the hospital of this case and the Plaintiff’s total period of No. 1370, Nov. 16, 2014>