1. All appeals by the plaintiff (appointed party) are dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff (Appointed Party).

The reasoning of the court's explanation of this case is as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, in addition to the part written by the court of first instance as to this case, since it is identical to the part written by the court of first instance in addition to the part written by the court of first instance as to this case, it cites it as it is in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act. The part written by the court of first instance

[Reasons for Recognition] without dispute, Gap evidence 1, Gap evidence 2, Gap evidence 4-1, 2, Gap evidence 8-1, 8-2, Gap evidence 12-2, Gap evidence 13, Eul evidence 13-2, Eul evidence 7-1, and Eul evidence 7-2, Eul evidence 7-1 and 2, the purport of the whole pleadings," and "7,273,990 won" in Part 5 of the first instance judgment of "27,273,990 won."

Part 3 of the judgment of the court of first instance (section 6, 17, 7, and 13, part 6, 6, 6, 7, 7, 7, 13, 3, 6, 00) shall be applied as follows:

Therefore, unlike the above recognition, the claim for damages of this case by the plaintiff et al., which is premised on the existence of a delay of performance due to the reason attributable to the defendant in relation to the obligation of transfer of ownership of a site right, is without merit

"If so, the plaintiff (appointed party)'s claim of this case is dismissed as it is without merit, and the judgment of the court of first instance is just in conclusion, and all appeals by the plaintiff (Appointed party) are dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition.