logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 의정부지방법원 2018.12.21 2018나208322
배당이의
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal against the defendants is dismissed in entirety.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

purport, purport, and.

Reasons

1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance concerning the instant case is that the Defendants are the most lessee, and the statement of evidence No. 3 in addition, which is insufficient to acknowledge the Plaintiff’s assertion, is rejected, and the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance is the same as that of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for the following parts among the grounds of the judgment of the court of first instance. Accordingly, this is acceptable in accordance with the main sentence of

[Supplementary Use] 1-e

The plaintiff who appeared on the date of the above distribution was dissatisfied with the total amount of each dividend to the defendants, and filed the lawsuit of this case on April 26, 2017."

ARTICLE 2-A

The defendants in the first sentence of Paragraph 1 shall add "K to "K".

At the bottom of the 5th page 12, the following shall be added:

In full view of the purport of the Plaintiff’s statement and the entire pleadings, the Defendants appear to have occupied and used each leased object as of August 22, 2018. The evidence alone submitted by the Plaintiff is difficult to deem that the Defendants concluded a lease agreement without the purpose of actually using and earning profit from each leased object.

Part 5, Part 13 "(5)" shall be 6 "............"

2. Conclusion, the Plaintiff’s respective claims against the Defendants in this case shall be dismissed as it is without merit.

Of the judgment of the first instance, the part against the Defendants in its conclusion is just, and since the Plaintiff’s appeal against the Defendants is without merit, all of the appeals are dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow