logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
Text
Reasons
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 2014.10.23 2014고정448
상해
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

At around 21:40 on August 2, 2013, the Defendant: (a) reported the Defendant’s desire to Nonparty E at the D restaurant located in Seo-gu Daejeon, Daejeon; and (b) expressed the victim F (E) “Is the Defendant’s desire to hump to hump to hump to humf; (c) humf, humf, and humf to humf; (d) humf, humf, and humf to humf to humf; and (e) caused the victim’s damage to the side humf inside the humf, which requires treatment for about 14 days.

Summary of Evidence

1. Each legal statement of witness F, E, and G;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes, such as a written injury diagnosis and photograph (investigative records No. 12 pages);

1. Relevant Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts, the choice of a fine, and the choice of a fine;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Judgment on the assertion by the Defendant and the defense counsel under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act

1. The defendant does not inflict any bodily injury on the victim.

2. In full view of the following circumstances acknowledged by the above-mentioned evidence, the facts charged can be sufficiently recognized.

Therefore, the above argument is without merit.

(1) The victim stated that, from an investigative agency to this court, the Defendant sustained injuries on the left kneee by assaulting the victim, such as consistently taking her own ear, flabing flaps, etc.

(Supplementary investigative agency held that the defendant was left to the right return in this court, but it seems difficult to reject the above statement solely on such circumstance in light of the statements of E and G. However, it is difficult to reject the above statement solely on such circumstance). ② The E stated from the investigative agency to this court that the defendant was able to catch the victim’s return, and that he was able to carry out flabbbing and flabing each other. This seems to correspond to the statement of the victim.

The defendant does not have any flapsing of the victim.

arrow