The judgment of the court below is reversed.

Defendants are not guilty. The summary of this judgment is publicly announced.

1. The Defendants did not jointly inflict any injury on the victim E in summary of the grounds for appeal.

2. Determination

A. The summary of the facts charged was found on September 23, 2015, on the ground that the Defendants were not aware of the overdue electricity rent, etc. from the victim E (n, 78 years old)’s dwelling visit prior to the visit of the victim E (n, e.g., the 78 years old), and Defendant A expressed the victim’s desire to “I am h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h

As a result, the Defendants jointly put up the scarcitys that require approximately 2 weeks of treatment to the victims.

B. The lower court determined that ① the victim was assaulted as stated in its judgment from the investigative agency to this court, consistently and specifically, as stated in the judgment by the Defendants.

The following facts are revealed: ② The witness F, immediately after the crime of this case, had been observed from the investigative agency to the court of this case, consistently observed the victim’s breath and breath, and the victim’s breath to the victim’s breath and the victim’s breath and the victim’s breath.

The statement to the effect that “the victim’s statement is consistent with the victim’s statement, and ③ the victim was diagnosed by the lower court’s scarke, left-hand scarke, left-hand 1 scarke, heat room, etc. on the day of the crime of this case, and the victim was subject to the victim’s assault from the Defendants.

4. The witness I was assaulted by G A, the victim by telephone, as stated in its reasoning by the Defendants in this Court.

The author said that the written diagnosis is cut.

The purport of “..........”