The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal is the victim’s intimidation and insulting speech to the defendant, and there is no time for the defendant to face the victim’s right side by drinking.

In addition, it is the self-defense or legitimate act that the defendant gets breath of the victim.

2. Determination

A. According to the following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly adopted and examined by the court below as to whether the defendant was a victim, the defendant's franchising of the victim's franchis, and the victim's left side by drinking, but it is not likely that the identity of the facts charged is recognized and the defendant's exercise of his right of defense is not likely to substantially disadvantage the victim's exercise of right of defense. Thus, the criminal facts constituting the crime of the judgment below are corrected ex officio to "the defendant who assaulted the victim to the right side of the victim by drinking."

It is recognized that an assault has been committed against one face face.

Defendant’s assertion is without merit.

1) The victim consistently enters the investigative agency from the victim's office to the court of the court below. The victim expressed that the defendant 6-8 years prior to the victim's office and expressed his desire to make the victim's 112 report to J, the representative of D real estate, and that the defendant her face was taken one time with another hand in front of the table of the victim's body. 2) G also stated that the defendant was able to report the defect in the victim's face by entering the victim's office and leaving the victim's office, coming out of the victim's office, and then the defendant was able to make a report to the victim, and that the victim was able to purchase the victim's face once, and that it conforms with the victim's statement.

3. Although the victim is at the right face of the investigative agency, the victim is at the right face.