logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 평택지원 2018.03.23 2017고정479
상해
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,500,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On February 6, 2017, at around 18:10, the Defendant: (a) assessed the victim’s left side of the victim’s cell phone holding the victim’s e-mail bat from the street “D restaurant” in front of Pyeongtaek-si; (b) assessed the victim’s face and back, and had the victim’s face and back, and caused ear and e-mail to undergo medical treatment for up to 10 days; and (c) inflicted injury on the victim’s e-mail and the following arms and other damage.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Legal statement of witness E;

1. A protocol concerning the interrogation of suspects of E;

1. Investigation report (a copy and analysis of black boxes and video files, and a case of electric shock machines);

1. E statements;

1. A written diagnosis of injury;

1. Each photograph (the defendant and his defense counsel acknowledged the fact that the defendant prices the victim's left side in the cell phone at the time of this case, but argued that there was no fact that the victim's face and face of the victim was taken by breath and breath with his breath's breath, etc.). However, the following circumstances acknowledged by each of the above evidence are consistent from the investigative agency to this court, namely, ① the victim was consistently at the time of this case when the victim's face and breath was taken by his finger and breath.

2. According to the fact that the Defendant and the victim made a statement to the effect that “the Defendant and the victim made a flobbial flobling with each other at the time of this case,” the Defendant and the victim suffered bodily injury, such as flobing and flobing flobing in addition to ear at the time of this case (hereinafter “the victim’s injury diagnosis document”)

In full view of the facts stated above, the above argument is rejected, since the above facts constituting the crime are sufficiently proven.

Application of Statutes

1. Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the facts constituting an offense;

1. Selection of an alternative fine for punishment;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act concerning the order of provisional payment;

arrow