The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal did not interfere with the duties of the victim as stated in the judgment of the court below, take the victim’s bath, or inflict an injury upon the victim by breathing breath.

2. In light of the following facts and circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly adopted and examined by the court below, i.e., ① the victim interfered with the construction of a vehicle at the entrance of the construction site by the investigative agency to the court below, ② the victim made a statement that he had satise and satise the victim’s satisfe at the entrance of the construction site; ② the statements in E investigative agency and the court of the court of the court below are consistent with the statements of the victim; ③ the on-site chief commissioner, and ③ the defendant made a statement that the construction interfered with the victim’s work as stated in the judgment of the court of the court below by setting up the entrance at the construction site; ② the victim’s satisf at the investigation agency and the court of the court of the court below; and ③ the defendant made a statement that the defendant interfered with the victim’s work as stated in the judgment of the court of the court below; insulting the victim;

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.