logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대법원 2016. 12. 29. 선고 2016두52514 판결
(심리불속행)거래대금 반환내역과 허위세금계산서 대가인 3P금액이 매출처의 장부에 기재되어 있으므로 사실과 다른 세금계산서에 해당함[국승]
Case Number of the immediately preceding lawsuit

Seoul High Court-2015-Nu68439 ( August 26, 2016)

Title

(1) Since the details of the return of the transaction price and the amount of 3P tax invoice, which is the false tax invoice, are entered in the account book of the seller, it constitutes a false tax invoice.

Summary

(1)As the 3P amount, which appears to be the return of transaction price and the issuance price of false tax invoices, is stated in the books of the seller, the issues are different from the facts.

Related statutes

Article 22 of the Value-Added Tax Act (Additional Tax)

Cases

2016Du52514 Revocation of Disposition of Imposition of Value-Added Tax

Plaintiff-Appellant

○○○○ Corporation

Defendant-Appellee

AA Head of the Tax Office

Judgment of the lower court

Seoul High Court Decision 2015Nu68439 Decided August 26, 2016

Imposition of Judgment

December 29, 2016

Text

The appeal is dismissed.

The costs of appeal are assessed against the Plaintiff.

Reasons

The records of this case and the judgment of the court below and the grounds of appeal were examined. However, the grounds of appeal on the grounds of appeal do not include the grounds provided in each subparagraph of Article 4(1) of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Procedure for Appeal of Supreme Court or are without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices.

arrow